07.08.07
Want to reduce crime? Reduce lead exposure
Fascinating. This, BTW, is another example of the fallacy of the “market forces will solve all problems” ideology (aka Libertarianism). That idea is that, given the terrible effects lead has when it’s freely released into the environment, market forces will naturally cause lead-based products to be replaced by lead-free substitutes—no government action needed. Those who believe that will believe just about anything.
UPDATE: More on what lead abatement can do.
… Although crime did fall dramatically in New York during Giuliani’s tenure, a broad range of scientific research has emerged in recent years to show that the mayor deserves only a fraction of the credit that he claims. The most compelling information has come from an economist in Fairfax who has argued in a series of little-noticed papers that the “New York miracle” was caused by local and federal efforts decades earlier to reduce lead poisoning.
The theory offered by the economist, Rick Nevin, is that lead poisoning accounts for much of the variation in violent crime in the United States. It offers a unifying new neurochemical theory for fluctuations in the crime rate, and it is based on studies linking children’s exposure to lead with violent behavior later in their lives.
What makes Nevin’s work persuasive is that he has shown an identical, decades-long association between lead poisoning and crime rates in nine countries.
“It is stunning how strong the association is,” Nevin said in an interview. “Sixty-five to ninety percent or more of the substantial variation in violent crime in all these countries was explained by lead.”
