11.24.07
Interesting article on cash incentives
My conservative readers will find this article right down their alley: people willing to make big changes for cash incentives, just as a conservative would predict. And liberals will endorse the idea for the social benefits that accrue. At last: something on which we can all agree. Still, as the article notes, some people object strenuously. I think that this in an indication that sometimes even a mildly complex idea idea—in fact, “complex” is an overstatement—is too much for some people to grasp.
“Anger over NHS plan to give addicts iPods,” ran the headline. The UK’s National Health Service is notoriously hard up, so news that government advisers were suggesting doctors offer drug addicts prizes as an incentive to stay clean was certain to raise some hackles. Why should “these people” with “self-inflicted” problems get priority, a patients’ advocate was quoted as asking in the article, published this July in The Sunday Times. “This country really is on its head,” concluded a reader in the newspaper’s online comments section.
Such reactions are typical when anyone raises the idea that addicts should be rewarded for changing their ways. Yet the fury over the proposal fails to account for one critical fact: incentive schemes work. And not just with drug abusers. Rewards have been used to help smokers quit, persuade parents to keep their children in school and boost uptake of healthcare. Far from being a waste of money, all the indications are that they can save money by reducing crime and other problems associated with poverty and drug use.
With over a decade’s worth of positive evidence, incentive schemes are finally getting the recognition they deserve.
