Good for her!!
Today, Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius (D) vetoed a bill that would require voters starting in 2010 to show identification at the polls. In her veto message, she said, “[N]o elected official should support enacting new laws discouraging or disenfranchising any American who has been legally voting for years.” Sebelius added that the bill “seeks to solve a problem of voter fraud which does not exist in our state.”
Portion-size inflation
Via Slashfood, check out how portion size has increased over the years—oddly enough, at the same time we were increasing in size.
Sen. Robert Byrd’s endorsement of Obama
The Booman Tribune has a very good post on the significance of Byrd’s endorsement of Obama.
The passing of the GOP era
Kevin Drum has some good thoughts on the dimming of the GOP star.
Today’s pimento cheese
I almost added an avocado to the latest batch of horseradish-bacon pimento cheese. I will do that for the next batch.
Today’s mix:
4 strips bacon (cooked on a rack in a 375º oven until crisp)
1/2 lb sharp cheddar
4 oz jar pimentos, drained
about 1/3 cup of good mayo (or to taste)
2-3 tsp horseradish
dash Worcestershire
dash pepper sauce
lots of ground black pepper.
Process the be-jesus out of it.
I’m also thinking of this mix:
Swiss cheese
Red onion
Mayo
Process, spread on toast, broil.
Sanchez on Rumsfeld
Phil Carter has a very interesting post in Intel Dump this morning. Here’s the beginning (but read the entire post):
By page 147 of his book, Lt. Gen. Ric Sanchez is getting his unit (the 1st Armored Division in Germany) ready for war in Iraq. But there’s a hitch — the Pentagon won’t tell them when, where, why or how they’re going. Sanchez recounts the way he felt on the receiving end of missives from Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, and he generalizes from this that the Bush administration’s concept of civil-military relations was deeply flawed:
The most devastating impact of Rumsfeld’s micromanagement was that warfighting commanders, all the way down to the division level, were never able to plan beyond the basic mission of defeating Saddam Hussein’s military. For example, I was initially told that 1st Armored Division would deploy to Iraq as one of the base plan units. Then I was told we would be a follow-on force. Then we weren’t going to deploy at all. Finally, we were going to deploy after major combat operations were concluded to handle the Phase IV mission.
Each time our orders changed, we had to stop our planning efforts, rethink and regroup, and then readjust our training programs. The constant changes drained our staff’s energy and negatively impacted our mission-specific training regiment. The frustration became so palpable that I finally threw up my hands to my staff and said “Stop! This has got to stop! We cannot continue to change our plans this way. From this moment on, we are going to plan and train for the reserve division mission [the most complex]. That way, whatever they finally decide to have us do, we’ll be ready.”
The Secretary of Defense was, in effect, involved in the operational decisions of the combatant commander. \And I do not believe that was either the spirit or the intent of the Goldwater-Nichols Act of 1986. In my mind, Donald Rumsfeld had changed the doctrine of “civilian control of the military” (when to go to war and for what purpose) to “civilian command of the military” (when to go to war, for what purpose, and how to wage war). That was a very dangerous thing to do, because our national civilian leadership does not have the expertise, judgment, intuition, or staff capacity to make informed decisions or recommendations on the detailed application of military forces. The level of control exercised by the Secretary of Defense went well beyond the establishment of broad policy goals and strategic objectives. He was now beginning a pattern of authoritative and dominating influence over the entire war effort.
Religion and happiness
Are religious people happier? Depends on where you are. Kevin Drum explains, with some interesting speculations on the reasons.
Suppressing the vote
The KITV (Keep In The Vote) efforts of the GOP are notorious, and Josh Marshall in TalkingPointsMemo gives an account of one effort to prove widespread voter fraud:
Since its inception, TPM has been chronicling the Republican party’s efforts to push bogus or wildly exaggerated claims of vote fraud to suppress voting among predominantly Democratic constituencies like the old, the poor and the non-white. And here we have another installment from the GOP vote fraud bamboozlement file.
Two years ago Texas’ Republican Attorney General Greg Abbott declared war on what he claimed was rampant vote fraud in Texas. He set up a special vote fraud unit and got a $1.4 million grant from the feds for the work.
Now, two years on, courtesy of the Dallas Morning News, we have a run-down of what Abbot came up with — 26 cases.
The details tell the story: All 26 cases involved Democrats, and almost were either blacks or Hispanics.
Of the 26, 8 appear to have been genuine cases of fraud, two of which were cases of people actually casting fraudulent ballots, as opposed to bogus registrations.
The remaining 18 cases all involved eligible voters casting legitimate mail-in ballots. The ‘fraud’ was that others collected the ballots and deposited them in mailboxes without putting their own name and address on the envelope in which the mail-in ballot was sent. These latter instances were almost all cases involving elderly or disabled voters who could not easily mail their own mail-in ballots. In other words, the great majority of the cases in his meager haul were technical violations that non-politicized prosecutor’s offices most likely never would have pursued.
Mind impairment from powerlessness
The following report from Science Daily is intriguing. One of the precepts of The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People is to focus on the things that you can control. (Book is discussed in this post.) I wonder whether that focus increases one’s sense of (relative) power. Certainly one can increase one’s sense of powerlessness by focusing on things outside one’s control, as I discuss here. And Martin Seligman discusses this phenomenon at length in his fascinating book Learned Optimism. Here’s the Science Daily report:
New research appearing in the May issue of Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, suggests that being put in a low-power role may impair a person’s basic cognitive functioning and thus, their ability to get ahead.
In their article, Pamela Smith of Radboud University Nijmegen, and colleagues Nils B. Jostmann of VU University Amsterdam, Adam Galinsky of the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University, and Wilco W. van Dijk of VU University Amsterdam, focus on a set of cognitive processes called executive functions. Executive functions help people maintain and pursue their goals in difficult, distracting situations. The researchers found that lacking power impaired people’s ability to keep track of ever-changing information, to parse out irrelevant information, and to successfully plan ahead to achieve their goals.
In one experiment, the participants completed a Stroop task, a common psychological test designed to exercise executive functions. Participants who had earlier been randomly assigned to a low-power group made more errors in the Stroop task than those who had been assigned to a high-power group. Smith and colleagues also found that these results were not due to low-power people being less motivated or putting in less effort. Instead, those lacking in power had difficulty maintaining a focus on their current goal.
In another experiment, participants were asked to move an arrangement of disks from a start position to a final position in as few moves as possible, known to researchers as the Tower-of-Hanoi task. This task tests the more complex ability of planning. In some trials there was a catch: participants had to move the first disk in a direction that was opposite to its final position. Low power participants made more errors and required more moves on these trials, demonstrating poor planning.
Smith and colleagues believe their results have “direct implications for management and organizations.” In high-risk industries such as health care, a single employee error can have fatal consequences. Empowering these employees could reduce the likelihood of such errors. Additionally, their work illustrates how hierarchies perpetuate themselves. By randomly assigning individuals to high and low-power conditions, they demonstrate that simply lacking power can automatically lead to performance that reinforces one’s low standing, sending the powerless towards a destiny of dispossession.
Consumer protection up for grabs
Joe Newman at the Watchdog Blog reports:
Right now, leaders in the House and Senate are preparing to make decisions behind the scenes that will have a tremendous impact on consumer protection in this country. If they can put aside partisan differences and ignore the lobbyists from the manufacturing industry, they have a chance to craft a bill that should help to stem the flood of life-threatening, hazardous products that led to a record number of recalls last year. On Thursday, parents and consumer activists rallied near the Capitol to urge Congress to pass the strongest protections possible. It’s especially an important issue for parents. Last year some 25 million hazardous toys and children’s products, many laden with high concentrations of lead, were recalled.
The U.S. Senate and House of Representatives have each passed a version of the Consumer Product Safety Reform Act (S. 2663/H.R. 4040) and senior members from both houses of Congress are meeting in conference to negotiate a compromise bill.
The Senate and House bills take important steps toward better protecting American consumers by giving the CPSC more resources, improving product testing standards and increasing the penalties manufacturers face for violating the law, among other improvements.
You can take action by writing your member of Congress and urging them to pass the strongest bill possible.
Sardines tonight
Just back from Whole Foods, where I bought a dozen fresh Monterey Bay sardines for dinner tonight (The Wife, a friend, and I). I figured out that the best cooking method is to roast them, and I think this is the recipe I’ll use:
Preheat oven to 450 degrees. Whisk together 1/4 cup extra virgin olive oil and 2 tsp hot paprika. Place sardines on a baking sheet and season inside and out with salt and pepper. With a pastry brush or spoon, coat fish with paprika oil. Roast sardines until they are just cooked through, about 7 minutes.
And I think I’ll fillet them:
Notes on cleaning and deboning sardines:
- Ideally, your fishmonger will clean (take out the guts and remove the scales) your sardines.
- If the sardines are not cleaned, then you need to make a slit in along the bottom length of the fish and pull out the blood and guts (it’s not as gross as it sounds). Then, remove the scales by running the dull edge of a knife against the grain of the scales (from tail to head lengthwise). Do all of this under cold, running water in a sink.
- Using a sharp paring knife, remove the top and bottom fins, being careful not to cut away more than necessary to get the fin.
- Then, cut the head off just behind the gills and discard.
- Using your thumb and pointer finger, grab the spine where it connected to the head and gently pull it and the rib cage away from the meat of the sardine’s filets, leaving the two filets connected in one butterflied piece. Holding the tail with your other hand, firmly separate the spine from the body and discard. Don’t worry too much if there are some tiny rib cage bones left behind — they’re edible.
UPDATE: The filleting of the sardines was easy and increasingly easier as I went through the batch. (I bought a “mean baker’s dozen”: 11.) The olive oil + paprika was good, but I think next time I’ll marinate them in a lemon-juice vinaigrette and then roast them that way. The time (7 minutes) was right on target at 450º. Very tasty little guys, and very few bones left.
UPDATE 2: See this post.
Accents
Via Very Short List, this tour of 21 accents voiced by Amy Walker. (She has more stuff on YouTube.)
Friendship in fiction
In the dinner conversation the other evening, we fell to talking about books, and I recommended the Patrick O’Brian series of Aubrey/Maturin novels because of their humor and the portrayal of the friendship of the two men. I commented that it was rare to find a fictional portrayal of friendship. The others (women) immediately pointed out that fictional friendships between and among women were easily found—and then, once it was mentioned, I could think of several myself. So why is it that friendships among women are so readily found in fiction and friendships among men relatively rare? Do men simply lack meaningful friendships for the most part?
Smooth as glass
Great shave today: Arko shaving stick on a two-day stubble, then the Plisson 12 HMW and a fine lather indeed. The Gillette Fat Boy with the used Treet Blue Special did such a good job that the oil pass would have found nothing to do. Finish with D.R. Harris Marlborough aftershave.
