07.05.08
The Messiah tradition around the time of Jesus
Very interesting article in the NY Times by Ethan Bronner. It begins:
A three-foot-tall tablet with 87 lines of Hebrew that scholars believe dates from the decades just before the birth of Jesus is causing a quiet stir in biblical and archaeological circles, especially because it may speak of a messiah who will rise from the dead after three days.
If such a messianic description really is there, it will contribute to a developing re-evaluation of both popular and scholarly views of Jesus, since it suggests that the story of his death and resurrection was not unique but part of a recognized Jewish tradition at the time.
The tablet, probably found near the Dead Sea in Jordan according to some scholars who have studied it, is a rare example of a stone with ink writings from that era — in essence, a Dead Sea Scroll on stone.
It is written, not engraved, across two neat columns, similar to columns in a Torah. But the stone is broken, and some of the text is faded, meaning that much of what it says is open to debate.
Still, its authenticity has so far faced no challenge, so its role in helping to understand the roots of Christianity in the devastating political crisis faced by the Jews of the time seems likely to increase.
Much more at the link.

bluelyon said,
6 July 2008 at 12:19 pm
You might want to check out this site: http://www.jesuspuzzle.com/
Scroll down and click on this link: Putting the Jesus Puzzle Together in 12 Easy Pieces with special attention to #6:
You may also want to rent this movie from Netflix.
Museum Ethics said,
6 July 2008 at 5:10 pm
I would submit that this “ancient tablet” is probably another sensationalist scam, as is clearly indicated by the facts
(1) that no specific information (apart from a vague 3rd-party rumor) is available on its provenance and
(2) that no details are provided on carbon dating of the ink.
As such, this “news” brings to mind the faked Lost-Tomb-of-Jesus “documentary” designed to make a profit off of people’s fascination with the “real” Jesus, as well as the larger scandal of the biased and misleading way the Dead Sea scrolls are being presented in museum exhibits around the world, with an antisemitic expression appearing on a government-run North Carolina museum’s website. See, e.g.,
http://spinozaslens.com/libet/articles/dworkin_ethicsofexhibition.htm
and
http://blog.news-record.com/staff/frontpew/archives/2008/06/dead_sea_scroll.shtml.
LeisureGuy said,
6 July 2008 at 5:21 pm
Museum Ethics: you may be right, though I think saying it’s “probably” a scam is unsupported by evidence. Certainly some scholars believe that it’s authentic, and they have examined the stone directly (rather than reading a newspaper account about it). From the story:
It is as much a mistake to doubt too soon as to believe too soon. A judicious wait is, I think, the proper stance for us non-scholars.