Later On

A blog written for those whose interests more or less match mine.

Interesting take on education

with one comment

From the blog synthesis:

If more money doesn’t ensure a better education, what does?

A few days ago, J.R. sent me a link to an excellent presentation by Sir Ken Robinson about how today’s schools kill creativity. J.R. also shared a recent post by Peter Bregman which advocates that you aren’t pushing hard enough if your path to success isn’t marked with failures. Then Kay (20 year public education veteran) sent me an email that illuminated a dynamic in education and health care that I had not considered before:

Quality

Prior to the 1960s, the American workforce excluded more people than it included, cutting off access to a huge, talent-laden pool of workers. During this time, most women were limited to three professions – nursing, teaching and administrative work. Thus limited, fully half our population’s best and brightest devoted their energy and passion to these three fields. Is it any wonder that wellness improved, schools (and students) in this country were among the best in the world, and companies were well-run?

Imagine that – society actually benefited from discrimination. How ironic!

Since there were more candidates than jobs, employers could hire the cream of the crop at "competitive" rates. Again – how lucky for education, health care, etc.!

Things changed in the 1960s – attitudes began to shift and opportunities began to grow. When presented with alternatives, once again the most talented of this community left their present and moved on to their future; this time to the detriment of education, health care, and business administration.

Creativity

Like most people, I believe that teachers are the most critical factor in student success.

Standardized curriculum/testing, prioritizing literacy and numeracy, and a lot of the challenges that Sir Ken identified have been around a long time, but until recently the teachers were so good, they overcame these issues and the students learned regardless. What’s more, because of their confidence and ability, teachers were also comfortable pushing limits, allowing their students to push limits, and together achieve great learning, knowing that mistakes and failures pave the way to insight.

In essence, the system wasn’t great prior to the 1960s, but our successes happened in spite of this, and only because

Continue reading. I was graduated from high school in 1957, and on looking back I realize that the power teachers in my small high school were all women.

Written by LeisureGuy

18 August 2009 at 9:01 am

Posted in Daily life, Education

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Someone once was telling me that their school was so wonderful back in the 1950s, with so many well-funded resources, and then realized — in the midst of praising the school to me — that it was wonderful in part because it got the lion’s share of the resources to teach a subset of all of the students in teh district (the white ones), while the rest of the students (the black ones) made do with substandard facilities and resources.

    cec

    18 August 2009 at 9:18 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 253 other followers