Later On

A blog written for those whose interests more or less match mine.

The FDA is NOT doing its job

with 2 comments

And in large part, I think, it’s because that Congress has refused to fund them adequately: short-staffed and under-funded, the FDA is incapable of doing the job we want. Lyndsey Layton has a front-page story on the problem in the Washington Post, but of course Congress is now out of town on their Spring recess. Still, I’m hoping that we could forego and fighter plane or two and greatly increase the FDA budget. Layton:

The expensive "sheep’s milk" cheese in a Manhattan market was really made from cow’s milk. And a jar of "Sturgeon caviar" was, in fact, Mississippi paddlefish.

Some honey makers dilute their honey with sugar beets or corn syrup, their competitors say, but still market it as 100 percent pure at a premium price.

And last year, a Fairfax man was convicted of selling 10 million pounds of cheap, frozen catfish fillets from Vietnam as much more expensive grouper, red snapper and flounder. The fish was bought by national chain retailers, wholesalers and food service companies, and ended up on dinner plates across the country.

"Food fraud" has been documented in fruit juice, olive oil, spices, vinegar, wine, spirits and maple syrup, and appears to pose a significant problem in the seafood industry. Victims range from the shopper at the local supermarket to multimillion companies, including E&J Gallo and Heinz USA.

Such deception has been happening since Roman times, but it is getting new attention as more products are imported and a tight economy heightens competition. And the U.S. food industry says federal regulators are not doing enough to combat it.


"It’s growing very rapidly, and there’s more of it than you might think," said James Morehouse, a senior partner at A.T. Kearney Inc., which is studying the issue for the Grocery Manufacturers Association, which represents the food and beverage industry.

John Spink, an expert on food and packaging fraud at Michigan State University, estimates that 5 to 7 percent of the U.S. food supply is affected but acknowledges the number could be greater. "We know what we seized at the border, but we have no idea what we didn’t seize," he said.

The job of ensuring that food is accurately labeled largely rests with the Food and Drug Administration. But it has been overwhelmed in trying to prevent food contamination, and fraud has remained on a back burner.

The recent development of high-tech tools — including DNA testing — has made it easier to detect fraud that might have gone unnoticed a decade ago. DNA can be extracted from cells of fish and meat and from other foods, such as rice and even coffee. Technicians then identify the species by comparing the DNA to a database of samples.

Another tool, isotope ratio analysis, can determine subtle differences between food — whether a fish was farmed or wild, for example, or whether caviar came from Finland or a U.S. stream.

The techniques have become so accessible that two New York City high school students, working with scientists at the Rockefeller University and the American Museum of Natural History last year, discovered after analyzing DNA in 11 of 66 foods — including the sheep’s milk cheese and caviar — bought randomly at markets in Manhattan were mislabeled.

"We put so much emphasis on food and purity of ingredients and where they come from," said Mark Stoeckle, a physician and DNA expert at Rockefeller University who advised the students. "But then there are things selling that are not what they say on the label. There’s an important issue here in terms of economics and consumer safety."

It is not clear how many food manufacturers, importers and retailers are testing products, but large companies with valuable brands to protect have been increasingly using the new technology, said Vincent Paez, director of food safety business development at Thermo Fisher Scientific, which sells some of the equipment and performs laboratory analysis, including DNA testing.

Still, of the hundreds of customers who bought 10 million pounds of mislabeled Vietnamese catfish — including national chains and top rated restaurants — only one or two caught the deception, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph Johns, who prosecuted the Fairfax fish importer. "It was the rare exception, not the norm," he said.

Heinz USA and Kraft Foods, two giant food makers with well- established internal controls, nevertheless fell victim to "Operation Rotten Tomato," a conspiracy in which the scion of a California farming dynasty was indicted this month. He was accused of disguising millions of pounds of moldy tomato paste as a higher- grade product and selling it to foodmakers.

And E&J Gallo, the nation’s largest wine seller, sold 18 million bottles of Red Bicyclette Pinot Noir between 2006 and 2008 that had been filled in France with wine made from cheaper merlot and syrah grapes, according to a French court that last month indicted a dozen of its citizens in a scam dubbed Pinotgate.

At the FDA’s first public meeting on food fraud last year, groups across the industry complained that it is not doing enough…

Continue reading. I suggest that food processors pay a tax of 0.1% (one-tenth of one percent) of gross sales and those funds go to the FDA, which should also be given responsibility for meat, poultry, and eggs, which now fall under the Dept of Agriculture.

Written by LeisureGuy

30 March 2010 at 11:34 am

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. We have been exporting to the USA from a foreign country and importing into the USA under a USA company a variety of exotic vegetable products for the past 10 years both in trailer load fresh for market as well as dehydrated in supplement type presentations.

    Two observations come to mind when reviewing your comment regarding underfunding.

    1. I have found that most FDA compliance officers that I have either met or spoken by phone with, of having minimal education. At times I have even pondered whether they actually completed High school or really received a GED.

    The food business import/export business for example is very intricate and I am not convinced that the compliance officers I have spoken with, really understand the specifics of their job requirements. I believe that they are just barely keeping up with understanding all the paperwork they need to fill out and really could not be bothered with the actual cargo manifesto’s, if the documents all square up, then they free the cargo.

    2. 10% of Cargo arriving to Long Beach terminals are inspected where as 95% of all cargo arriving to the port of Hong Kong is inspected. This is not a question of manpower, it’s a question of organizational capacity.

    3. The FDA compliance officers are no longer allowed a free hand in passing judgment on questionable cargo. If there is something wrong with the paper work, it is detained in quarantine and all documents are passed on to FDA district offices. They no longer have the power to make independent assessments. Makes you wonder if the higher ups realize that the ones in the field are the officers making the errors in judgment, not because they are short staffed.

    4. We need to pay these positions more to attract better educated people to fill the positions.

    Just my humble opinion

    nick

    30 March 2010 at 5:29 pm

  2. Excellent comment. Thanks. I’m forwarding to my Representative and Senators.

    LeisureGuy

    30 March 2010 at 5:44 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 253 other followers