WellPoint routinely targets breast cancer patients
I really wish the US had national single-payer healthcare that covers everyone (cf. France). Instead, we have this (as reported by Murray Waas for Reuters):
One after another, shortly after a diagnosis of breast cancer, each of the women learned that her health insurance had been canceled. First there was Yenny Hsu, who lived and worked in Los Angeles. Later, Robin Beaton, a registered nurse from Texas. And then, most recently, there was Patricia Relling, a successful art gallery owner and interior designer from Louisville, Kentucky.
None of the women knew about the others. But besides their similar narratives, they had something else in common: Their health insurance carriers were subsidiaries of WellPoint, which has 33.7 million policyholders — more than any other health insurance company in the United States.
The women all paid their premiums on time. Before they fell ill, none had any problems with their insurance. Initially, they believed their policies had been canceled by mistake
They had no idea that WellPoint was using a computer algorithm that automatically targeted them and every other policyholder recently diagnosed with breast cancer. The software triggered an immediate fraud investigation, as the company searched for some pretext to drop their policies, according to government regulators and investigators.
Once the women were singled out, they say, the insurer then canceled their policies based on either erroneous or flimsy information. WellPoint declined to comment on the women’s specific cases without a signed waiver from them, citing privacy laws.
That tens of thousands of Americans lost their health insurance shortly after being diagnosed with life-threatening, expensive medical conditions has been well documented by law enforcement agencies, state regulators and a congressional committee. Insurance companies have used the practice, known as "rescission," for years. And a congressional committee last year said WellPoint was one of the worst offenders.
But WellPoint also has specifically targeted women with breast cancer for aggressive investigation with the intent to cancel their policies, federal investigators told Reuters. The revelation is especially striking for a company whose CEO and president, Angela Braly, has earned plaudits for how her company improved the medical care and treatment of other policyholders with breast cancer.
The disclosures come to light after a recent investigation by Reuters showed that another health insurance company, Assurant Health, similarly targeted HIV-positive policyholders for rescission. That company was ordered by courts to pay millions of dollars in settlements.
In his push for the health care bill, President Barack Obama said the legislation would end such industry practices. Making the case for reform in a September address to Congress, Obama specifically cited the cancellation of Robin Beaton’s health insurance. Aides to the president, who requested they not be identified, told Reuters that no one in the White House knew WellPoint was systematically singling out breast cancer patients like her.
Many critics worry the new law will not lead to an end of these practices…
Continue reading. And thanks to The Eldest for the pointer.
When I blog stories like this, I always recall the commenter who said that we can simply trust businesses to do the right thing—no regulation or oversight needed.
And, of course, there are those who claim that the market will correct abuses of this sort—whereas in fact, the market supports abuses of this sort: WellPoint undoubtedly increased their profits by cancelling these policies, and without government oversight they would get away with it completely. The market loves companies that increase profits, and companies are always willing to cut corners if it will grow profits.

This is truly a disgusting practice, I can’t think of a better adjective, sorry but it is just plain disgusting ! The people responsible for instituting these kind of policies should be thrown in Jail, not fined. I think jail is much better as they would lose income as well as time in a less than adequate environment that would provide them with – how ironic.. – free health care.
Question: Do Jailed inmates (city,county,state and federal) have access to free Health Care ?
nick
22 April 2010 at 12:15 pm
Yes, though it’s not necessarily the best. There are obvious reasons: one doesn’t want a contagious disease loose in a crowded facility (jail, prison, college dorm, etc.), and since prisoners have no access to medical care except as provided by the state, the state does provide. Similarly for active-duty military.
LeisureGuy
22 April 2010 at 12:33 pm