Later On

A blog written for those whose interests more or less match mine.

Corporate overreach

leave a comment »

A disturbing article in the NY Times by Daniel Akst:

In order for one of my boys to play indoor lacrosse this winter, I was asked to sign a release indemnifying the sports dome and a long list of its business associates, volunteers, advertisers and (presumably) their family pets against any possible claim filed on behalf of my son.

One-sided legal releases are part of modern life, but these ubiquitous documents often contain little-noticed indemnification clauses — legal provisos requiring consumers to protect a business or some other party from damage claims and legal fees, sometimes even those arising from their own negligence.

Basically, they make every one of us an insurer. Indemnification clauses have been a pernicious feature of freelance writing contracts for years. As a result, threadbare scribes ludicrously agree to protect giant publishing conglomerates not only against judgments, but against the ruinous cost of defending even the most far-fetched legal claims.

Clauses like this often are tucked into the fine print nobody reads when clicking around the Internet or otherwise doing daily business.

Try a little Googling on this score. If you used a money-back guarantee available for a while on Iams cat food in Germany, you agreed to indemnify Procter & Gamble (fiscal 2012 sales: $83.7 billion). The official terms of use for Skype, the popular phone and messaging service, also include an indemnification clause. So does the eBay user agreement. “If anyone brings a claim against us related to your actions, content or information on Facebook,” says that site’s Statement of Rights and Responsibilities, “you will indemnify and hold us harmless from and against all damages, losses, and expenses of any kind (including reasonable legal fees and costs) related to such claim.”

Demands for indemnification don’t just come from businesses. One parent (who asked not to be named) had to sign a form indemnifying the Girl Scouts of Northern California so that her daughter could take part in a ropes course high off the ground. The mother might not want to bother seeking help from the California Department of Consumer Affairs, since its Web site requires users to indemnify the agency (and the usual list of hangers-on) “against all claims and expenses, including attorneys’ fees.”

Of course, the parent didn’t have to sign, but she also didn’t want her daughter left out.

I’ve faced the same choice — give up my rights or keep my kids home. In order for my son to attend a summer program at the Simon’s Rock campus of Bard College, for example, I agreed to release the institution, its trustees and (as far as I can tell) all their Facebook friends from any liability and to “fully and forever agree to indemnify” them in case of any claims arising from my son’s stay.

So I’m a regular Lloyd’s of London. Yet regulation of my role as an all-purpose insurer is scandalously lax. I haven’t heard a peep from my state’s insurance regulator, for instance; evidently this official is blithely uninterested in just how much capital I’ve set aside — hang on while I go through the sofa cushions for change — to cover the vast potential liabilities lurking on our family’s balance sheet.

IT’S bad enough that everywhere I go, someone wants me to promise not to sue. I was once asked to sign a release as a houseguest in a private home! And to some extent, I’m sympathetic; it’s stressful and expensive to live in such a litigious society. But it’s ridiculous to demand that every Tom, Dick and Mary assume a liability that can only properly rest with those who bear responsibility. And it’s a perversion of the tort system, which is supposed to put the onus on the parties most able to make sure things are done right. Leaving aside the adequacy of my loss reserves, are these indemnifications legally enforceable? It depends how far they go and which state you’re in.

Continue reading.

A Federal law could put a stop this insanity.

Written by LeisureGuy

9 December 2012 at 9:39 am

Posted in Business, Daily life, Law

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,294 other followers