Later On

A blog written for those whose interests more or less match mine.

Facebook Silences Rohingya Reports of Ethnic Cleansing

leave a comment »

Facebook allowed Russian groups to buy ads to influence US election, Facebook allows people to target their ads to anti-Semites and white supremacists (though Facebook said they have stopped doing that in specific cases), and now Facebook is censoring reports of ethnic cleansing. Maybe Facebook has too much power and is prone to using that power unwisely.

Betsy Woodruff reports in The Daily Beast:

Rohingya activists—in Burma and in Western countries—tell The Daily Beast that Facebook has been removing their posts documenting the ethnic cleansing of Rohingya people in Burma (also known as Myanmar). They said their accounts are frequently suspended or taken down.

The Rohingya people are a Muslim ethnic minority group in Burma. They face extraordinary persecution and violence from the Burmese military; military personnel torch villages, murder refugees, and force hundreds of thousands of people to flee their homes.

Human rights watchdogs say the persecution has intensified in recent months, and a top UN official described a renewed offensive by the Burmese military as “a textbook example of ethnic cleansing.” Hundreds of thousands of Rohingya refugees have fled to Bangladesh. Sen. John McCain, who chairs the Senate Armed Services Committee, has called for reduced military cooperation with the Burmese government because of the violence.

Rohingya people trying to use social media to share information about the attacks on them tell The Daily Beast they have had their posts removed and their accounts shut down, and that they hope Facebook stops silencing them.

A Facebook representative told The Daily Beast the company would look into the situation. “We want Facebook to be a place where people can share responsibly, and we work hard to strike the right balance between enabling expression while providing a safe and respectful experience,” said Facebook spokesperson Ruchika Budhraja in a statement. “That’s why we have Community Standards, which outline what type of sharing is allowed on Facebook and what type of content may be reported to us and removed. Anyone can report content to us if they think it violates our standards. In response to the situation in Myanmar, we are carefully reviewing content against our Community Standards.”

Facebook is currently facing substantial criticism for what appears to be an indifferent attitude toward promoting divisive material. Last week, ProPublica revealed that the network sold ads tailored to “Jew haters.” Days earlier, The Daily Beast reported that Russian front groups used Facebook to organize anti-refugee rallies.

Facebook is an essential platform in Burma; since the country’s infrastructure is underdeveloped, people rely on it the way Westerners rely on email. Experts often say that in Burma, Facebook is the internet—so having your account disabled can be devastating.

Laura Haigh, Amnesty International’s Burma researcher, told The Daily Beast there appears to be a targeted campaign in Burma to report Rohingya accounts to Facebook and get them shut down.

Mohammad Anwar, a Kuala Lumpur-based Rohingya activist and journalist with the site RohingyaBlogger.com, told The Daily Beast that Facebook has repeatedly deleted his posts about violence in Rakhine State, and has threatened to disable his account.

He shared screenshots with The Daily Beast of posts that Facebook removed.

One screenshot shows a post from Anwar about military activity in Burma’s Rakhine State, where most of the country’s Rohingya people live. It’s also where the Burmese military focuses its attacks.

The post, which Anwar published on Aug. 28, noted that Burmese military helicopters were flying over Rohingya villages in the Maungdaw District of Rakhine State.

“We removed the post below because it doesn’t follow the Facebook Community Standards,” read a message from Facebook over the post, which alerted him it had been deleted.

The same day, Anwar posted about members of the Burmese military burning down a Rohingya Hamlet in the Maungdaw District. That post was also removed, with the same message from Facebook citing Community Standards.

The social networking site says it will pull down posts or disable accounts that make direct threats to users; encourage suicide or self-harm; or promote terrorist organizations or organized hate groups. But beyond that, the company is vague about what kind of speech it bans; in a blog post it published on May 23 of this year, Facebook’s head of global policy management Monika Bickert said company standards “change over time” and involve cases that are “often in a grey area where people disagree.”

In another post, Anwar detailed military atrocities.

“#Rohingya homes in the downtown of #Maungdaw are still being set ablaze by the #Myanmar military & #Rakhine extremists,” he wrote.

The post was removed. Facebook later temporarily froze his account and threatened to permanently disable it. . .

Continue reading.

Written by LeisureGuy

19 September 2017 at 5:46 pm

Trump White House Reportedly Nixed Study Showing Benefits of Refugees

leave a comment »

The GOP seems to detest facts and ignores them whenever possible. Benjamin Hart reports in New York magazine:

Ahead of an October 1 decision on how many refugees to admit into the United States next year, the New York Times reports that the Trump administration nixed a report showing that displaced people are beneficial to the U.S. economy. Commissioned by the White House in an effort to help justify its anti-immigration policy platform, the full document never made its way to President Trump, and officials believe it was suppressed before it got there.

The Times has the details of what the never-published report found:

The internal study, which was completed in late July but never publicly released, found that refugees “contributed an estimated $269.1 billion in revenues to all levels of government” between 2005 and 2014 through the payment of federal, state and local taxes. “Overall, this report estimated that the net fiscal impact of refugees was positive over the 10-year period, at $63 billion.”

But White House officials said those conclusions were illegitimate and politically motivated, and were disproved by the final report issued by the agency, which asserts that the per-capita cost of a refugee is higher than that of an American.

Rather than include the key data, the final draft limited its findings to how much money Department of Health and Human Services spends on an average refugee compared to a U.S. citizen. By that metric, it found that refugees seek government services more often, “reflecting a greater participation of refugees in H.H.S. programs, especially during their first four years.”

Stephen Miller, the Trump team’s preeminent immigration hawk, has been arguing that the U.S. should greatly reduce the number of refugees allowed into the country. The Trump administration already halved President Obama’s refugee quota from about 100,000 to about 50,000 people this year, but Miller wants to go much further in the future. (Even the numbers Obama approved were minuscule, on a per-capita basis, compared to Canada and many European countries.) Whatever quota the Trump administration arrives at will likely be the lowest in decades.

Miller, the 32-year-old former Jeff Sessions aide, has had a hand in most of the president’s big nativist moments. He authored the infamous “American carnage” inauguration speech and other addresses that have portrayed immigrants as “animals” who commit grisly crimes. And, not surprisingly, he appears to be one of the central voices that squashed the report in question; the Times reports that Miller “personally intervened in the discussions on the refugee cap to ensure that only the costs — not any fiscal benefit — of the program were considered, according to two people familiar with the talks.” Never mind that many other studies have also shown that refugees are a benefit, not a drain, to American society. . .

Continue reading.

Written by LeisureGuy

19 September 2017 at 5:25 pm

Moving van is now loaded…

leave a comment »

Two guys from Allied Van Lines, my favorite moving company, worked hard today and the household goods that were packed yesterday have now been loaded. Tomorrow the apartment gets cleaned. Departure nears.

Written by LeisureGuy

19 September 2017 at 5:22 pm

Posted in Daily life

Wee Scot, D.R. Harris Lavender shave stick, 102, and Esbjerg aftershave

leave a comment »

Much the same as yesterday, with a stellar result. Shaving starts chaotic days calmly.

Written by LeisureGuy

19 September 2017 at 6:43 am

Posted in Shaving

The normalizing of bald-faced lying and the likely cause for the drop in teen pregnancy

leave a comment »

Kevin Drum has an excellent column, and I think he’s right about the reason for the decline in teen pregnancy.

Written by LeisureGuy

18 September 2017 at 7:24 pm

Posted in Daily life

All packed up and ready to go

with 2 comments

And tomorrow morning the truck will be loaded and on its way. I can tell unpacking will be a challenge, but there’s no deadline for that.

Written by LeisureGuy

18 September 2017 at 4:00 pm

Posted in Daily life

Wee Scot, Meißner Tremonia Strong ‘n Scottish shaving paste, iKon 102, and Esbjerg aftershave gel

leave a comment »

No photo, alas. I found a tiny tub of Strong ‘n Scottish shaving paste, and I do like Meißner Tremonia’s shaving pastes—they’re like a firm shaving cream. The lather was everything one could want, and the 102 did a fine job on the two-day stubble.

A little dot of the Esbjerg, and I’m ready to go out for breakfast. It will be good when this week is over.

Written by LeisureGuy

18 September 2017 at 7:06 am

Posted in Shaving

%d bloggers like this: