Muddy thinking by a climate skeptic
ThinkProgress has a note on climate skeptic Dr. William Gray of Colorado State University. He is, naturally enough, disgusted with Al Gore’s winning the Nobel Peace Prize, and he expresses his disgust with various ad hominem attacks. But Dr. Gray also makes scientific arguments, flawed though they are. Read a rebuttal of his recent efforts. It begins:
Anybody who has followed press reporting on global warming, and particularly on its effects on hurricanes, has surely encountered various contrarian pronouncements by William Gray, of Colorado State University. A meeting paper that Gray provided in advance of the 2006 27th Conference on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology (taking place this week in Monterey California, and covered here by CNN), provides an illuminating window into Gray’s thinking on the subject. Our discussion is not a point-by-point rebuttal of Gray’s claims; there is far more wrong with the paper than we have the patience to detail. Gray will have plenty of opportunities to hear more about the work’s shortcomings if it is ever subjected to the rigors of peer review. Here we will only highlight a few key points which illustrate the fundamental misconceptions on the physics of climate that underlie most of Gray’s pronouncements on climate change and its causes.
Gray’s paper begins with a quote from Senator Inhofe calling global warming a hoax perpetrated on the American people, and ends with a quote by a representive of the Society of Petroleum Geologists stating that Crichton’s State of Fear has “the absolute ring of truth.” It is the gaping flaws in the scientific argument sandwiched between these two statements that are our major concern.
The post then goes on to analyze various of Gray’s claims.
No doubt that Gore’s Nobel prize win will provide ammunition for those that say CC is a left wing conspiracy. However, the UK government has likened the fight against obesity to be the battle for climate change. Gore is keen to help.
Ei2g
15 October 2007 at 2:40 pm