Later On

A blog written for those whose interests more or less match mine.

A pyrrhic victory for those sentenced for crack

leave a comment »

They won parity with cocaine sentences, but now judges are balking and throwing up obstacles. As pointed out in comments at the link, the issue is really one of the well-off (light sentences) vs. the poor (heavy sentences), rather than (or in addition to) simple racism. Here’s the story:

As federal courts begin the unprecedented task of deciding whether thousands of prisoners should receive lower sentences for crimes involving crack cocaine, some judges are telling poor convicts that they won’t get lawyers to help them argue for leniency.

As a result, some prisoners are being left to argue on their own behalf against skilled prosecutors in cases that have already been labeled unjust.

Defense advocates have argued for more than 20 years that the more severe sentences given for crack cocaine offenses, compared to those handed down for crimes involving powder cocaine, were unfair to African-American defendants. A majority of crack cocaine defendants are African-American, while most powder cocaine defendants are white.

Last year, the U.S. Sentencing Commission recognized the disparity and recommended lighter penalties in crack cocaine cases.

Now the 20,000 prisoners who’re eligible for the lower sentences must ask a court to reconsider their cases. Many have said they’re too poor to hire lawyers to ask for the lower sentences, and judges have appointed federal defenders to represent them at taxpayers’ expense.

But other judges have declined to appoint attorneys, saying they aren’t needed for what should be a straightforward sentencing matter nor are they required under the Constitution. Judges have the sole authority to appoint such attorneys.

The constitutional right to an attorney after criminal indictment and during trial and sentencing is undisputed. But several federal appeals and district courts have concluded that judges generally don’t have to appoint attorneys for convicted criminals who’re seeking corrected sentences.

Without lawyers, some defendants with legitimate requests will be overlooked, say federal defenders who’re screening many of the crack cocaine cases.

“We’re being left to fend for ourselves,” said Eyvonne Garrett, a prisoner in Fort Worth, Texas, who was denied an attorney and a lower sentence. “Without an attorney, we don’t have a voice.”

The number of prisoners who don’t have attorneys is unknown. So far, judges aren’t tracking the outcomes of the crack sentence-reduction cases nationally.

A lawyer can make a difference. Judges can weigh different factors such as behavior in prison. Although many of the prisoners will be released two to three years early, some have received almost a decade off their sentences.

Meanwhile, crack cocaine sentences are still as much as five times longer on average than powder cocaine sentences, even with the new guidelines.

Garrett, who’s serving eight years for distributing more than 50 grams of crack, hoped that with help from an attorney her sentence would be cut in half.

In her request to a judge for an attorney and a reduced sentence, Garrett said that she was getting A’s in business courses at a community college. Since she went to prison in 2003, she’s participated in drug rehabilitation and in a program in which she speaks to troubled young women.

In a 24-page legal brief opposing her request, federal prosecutors argued that she’d already received a lower sentence and didn’t deserve any more time off.

U.S. District Judge Sam Cummings rejected her request for an attorney and agreed with prosecutors on her sentence. He didn’t elaborate on his decision in his one-page ruling.

“I was shocked,” Garrett said. “I thought I had done everything I was supposed to do.”

Garrett, 40, said in a phone interview from prison that she wanted to be released early to care for her five children. A cousin has custody of them.

Garrett said she’d researched the arguments herself “along with a whole law library of ladies” who’re in the same situation. Garrett said that one of the women had a case like hers but a judge in another region appointed an attorney for her. The woman was released recently.

“It’s a disadvantage not having a lawyer, because we don’t have access to the prosecutor,” Garrett said. “An attorney can go, and negotiate and work it out.”

Garrett said she became involved in crack because her ex-boyfriend was a dealer. She said she wasn’t a crack addict, but had introduced him to his connections.

“I made a mistake. I paid the price,” she said.

“But just because you become a prisoner, your life isn’t stopped. You can continue to better yourself as a human being and as a mother. I am a better person, I can be a good citizen and I will not be returning to prison.”

Jason Hawkins, an assistant federal defender in Dallas, said Garrett appeared to be making a legitimate argument for a lower sentence but couldn’t compete against experienced prosecutors.

“Not appointing counsel allows the government to run over people as if they’re mere speed bumps in this process,” Hawkins said. “A litigant with very little schooling is not going to be able to go up against a career prosecutor who is filing 24-page briefs on this issue.”

Hawkins, who’s handling most of the crack cases in the region, can’t represent Garrett without approval from the judge.

Cummings, whose court is in Lubbock, hasn’t appointed federal defenders in any of the crack cases that he’s deciding. He declined to be interviewed for this story.

U.S. District Judge Barbara Lynn, whose Dallas court is in the same region, has appointed lawyers in all crack cases so far.

“The government is represented by counsel,” Lynn said in an interview. “I’m making sure the defendant has counsel, too.”

Continue reading.

Written by Leisureguy

22 April 2008 at 12:31 pm

Posted in Daily life, Government

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: