Later On

A blog written for those whose interests more or less match mine.

Three big amendments on spying

leave a comment »

Mike Lillis has an important story in the Washington Independent, which begins:

For privacy advocates and civil libertarians, June (not April) was the cruelest month.

First, House Democratic leaders passed a long-negotiated compromise bill expanding the Bush administration’s electronic surveillance authority, including legal immunity for any wrongdoing that the phone companies might have committed in cooperating without court oversight. Days later, the Senate moved overwhelmingly toward passage of the same bill, which stalled last week due more to time constraints than to lawmaker opposition.

Somewhere in the mix, Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.) — the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee and a fierce opponent of telecom immunity in the past — announced his support for the compromise bill (albeit with the hedge that he would later work to remove the immunity language). The flurry of activity has led liberal voters to skewer Democratic leaders for placing campaign-trail fears above constitutional rights — and to wonder who in Washington remains willing to fight for civil liberties within the thorny context of national security.

Next week, they will have their answer.

The Senate on Tuesday is expected to take up three amendments to the House-passed compromise that expands White House spying powers under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA. All three aim to hold the telecom companies to account for their cooperation in the administration’s warrantless wiretapping program, which, in the name of fighting terrorism, allowed the National Security Agency to intercept some domestic communications without a court order. The program was launched shortly after the 9/11 attacks, but wasn’t exposed until The New York Times broke the story in late 2005.

Under one amendment, …

the telecom immunity provision would be stripped out of the bill completely. The proposal is sponsored by Sens. Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.), Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. A proposal to eliminate the immunity language, offered earlier in the year, failed by a wide margin, 67 to 31.

Feingold, who played a central role in delaying the final FISA vote until after the July 4 recess, released a video this week thanking the supporters of his push. “I teased some of my colleagues,” he says in the video. “I said we can celebrate the Constitution on July 4 and maybe when you come back you’ll decide not to tear it up.”

A second amendment, sponsored by Sen. Arlen Specter (Penn.), the highest ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee and a prominent critic of the administration about this program, would empower the court to deny the phone companies their immunity if it found that the administration’s actions were unconstitutional.

The final amendment, sponsored by Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.), would delay the effective date of the immunity provision until inspectors general of the Dept. of Justice, the Pentagon and several other agencies have finished an investigation into the warrantless surveillance program and reported their findings to Congress. That investigation is already included in the House-passed compromise soon to be tackled in the Senate. But privacy groups argue that the investigation would hold greater significance if the conclusions can inform how to handle the participating telecoms.

Continue reading.

Written by Leisureguy

2 July 2008 at 8:39 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: