Later On

A blog written for those whose interests more or less match mine.

The GOP hates women and sex

with one comment

Along with other objects of hatred: people of non-Christian religions, minorities, the poor, gays and lesbians, and so on. But seldom is it so clearly revealed recently. Steve Benen writes:

This is an unusually instructive look into the far-right’s perspective on sexual health.

Democrats were outraged Wednesday morning when [Colorado] Republican state Sen. Dave Schultheis said he planned to vote against a bill to require HIV tests for pregnant women because the disease "stems from sexual promiscuity" and he didn’t think the Legislature should "remove the negative consequences that take place from poor behavior and unacceptable behavior." The Colorado Springs lawmaker then proceeded to cast the lone vote against SB-179, which passed 32-1 and moves on to the House.

Schultheis, it’s worth noting, is the state senator for James Dobson and Focus on the Family.

I can’t relate to an ideology that can fairly be described as "twisted," but let’s be clear. Schultheis believes it’s important for women to face "negative consequences" for sexual behavior that he considers "unacceptable." If that means more women and children become HIV positive, he’s fine with that.

It’s a perspective that effectively argues, as my friend Morbo once put it, "They sinned, now let them suffer for it."

It’s the same rationale that led many conservatives to oppose initiatives to combat the human papillomavirus (HPV), which increases a woman’s chances of developing cervical cancer. A vaccine that immunizes against HPV infection has been developed, but some far-right groups, most notably the Family Research Council, have opposed making it widely available to young women. As an FRC representative said a while back, the vaccine "could be potentially harmful" to women "because they may see it as a license to engage in premarital sex."

It’s practically identical to Schultheis’ take. The key is to discourage sex. If the discouragement leads to "negative consequences" — cancer, HIV, etc. — so be it.

Remember, these folks like to consider themselves "pro-family." No, I don’t understand it, either.

Written by Leisureguy

26 February 2009 at 1:33 pm

Posted in Daily life, GOP, Health, Medical

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. When Republicans attempt to discourage premarital sex, all it does is encourage premarital sex. Especially for me. Before I read this, I was just going to go and watch TV. But now, i’m going to do a bit of fucking.



    1 March 2009 at 11:07 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: