Later On

A blog written for those whose interests more or less match mine.

Andrew Sullivan on the stupidity of the UK drug laws

leave a comment »

Andrew Sullivan:

My London column today is on the dramatically shifting landscape for marijuana in the US, with growing acceptance of medical cannabis, growing numbers of states allowing it, California’s consideration of outright legalization and taxation, and the Obama Justice Department’s decision to let states govern themselves on the question, without federal interference. It comes after the Labour government has actually tried to increase penalties for pot – against the advice of its own chairman of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD). The wonderfully named Professor David Nutt was fired by the government after he noted certain quite obvious facts:

Professor Nutt had become a thorn in the side of ministers with his criticisms of drugs policy. He clashed with former home secretary Jacqui Smith when he suggested ecstasy, which causes 30 deaths a year, was less dangerous than horse-riding, which causes 100 deaths a year. He also argued that, to prevent one episode of schizophrenia linked to cannabis use, it would be necessary to “stop 5,000 men aged 20 to 25 from ever using” the drug…

The Home Secretary asked him to consider his position after a recent lecture in which attacked what he called the “artificial” separation of alcohol and tobacco from other, illegal, drugs. Last night Professor Nutt said he stood by his comments. “My view is policy should be based on evidence. It’s a bit odd to make policy that goes in the face of evidence. The danger is they are misleading us.

“The scientific evidence is there: it’s in all the reports we published. Our judgements about the classification of drugs like cannabis and ecstasy have been based on a great deal of very detailed scientific appraisal.

“Gordon Brown makes completely irrational statements about cannabis being ‘lethal’, which it is not. I’m not prepared to mislead the public about the harmfulness of drugs like cannabis and ecstasy. I think most scientists will see this as an example of the Luddite attitude of governments towards science.”

He repeated his view that cannabis was “not that harmful” and that parents should be more worried about alcohol.

They should. Alcohol is far more dangerous to the individual and to society than marijuana. Brits, of all people, should know this. If pubs served pot rather than beer, violent crime in Britain would plummet. Mercifully, the science establishment is fighting back against the firing of someone for telling the scientific truth. Two other scientific advisers have now quit in protest.

Written by LeisureGuy

2 November 2009 at 10:24 am

Posted in Daily life, Drug laws

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.